The concept of
discourse community is one that has been extensively discussed among many
scholars throughout literary history, and is one that is still greatly debated
to this day. Before I define what discourse community will mean for this
article, it is important to reference the main schools of thought that are
prevalent to this large topic. Swales discusses discourse communities as an
entity with rules and structure. To make an analogy, he treats them as countries;
corporeal entities that anyone can enter and learn the rules and become a
citizen. It is possible to be a multi-citizen in many different countries, and
similarly Swales states that it is possible to be a member of more than one
community. Following this analogy, you still have a main “country” that you are
best versed at and stay at the most. This whole concept is very different from
the one that Gee presents, that of Discourses, where he presents the opportunity
for another wonderful analogy. He states that there are multiple Discourses,
and though we many learn the rules of others and visit them, we truly only have
one main discourse. This is similar to the states in the US, where you can go
back and forth between the states and must follow all of the laws in said
state, but you only live in one state at a time. These two different views on
the same concept show the opposite sides that exist, and in reality there is a
more moderated concept that fits a wider audience.
No comments:
Post a Comment